Categories and Criteria 2023

Organisational Categories Criteria:

2030 Climate Action - Prize

Institutions are having to plan how they get to net-zero emissions. This category focuses on the steps that institutions are taking and planning to take to reach their targets. The judges are looking for innovative ideas and approaches that institutions are taking or planning. It is recognised that there will not be the normal evidence or impact available as this category is looking at current plans, with the focus being on intentions.

Carbon reduction and adaptation to the effects of climate change are essential for institutional resilience and business continuity – both executive-level issues for our institutions. Universities and colleges are exposed to significant climate risks and responsibilities to meet targets and institutions have to be taking bold steps to meet these targets while ensuring student outcomes and satisfaction are maintained.

The judges will be looking for:

• Innovative plans for achieving net-zero.
• Focus on achieving Scope 1 and 2 emissions initially with Scope 3 in the horizon.
• How do you know you are getting there? Outline what steps are being taken in the area of measurement and verification of impact of efforts on the progress towards net-zero.
• What steps are being taken on mitigation and adaptation?
• Actions that can be scalable and transferable to other institutions and across the sector.
• Plans and actions that are looking at the whole institution and holistic approach.
• Examples of using internal research and academic knowledge in helping advance actions.
• Examples of working in partnership within your local community and other stakeholders.

The aim of this category is to share the good efforts institutions are taking as well as learning from each other on areas that have not worked so well. Whilst the end results will not be available, judges will look at projected impacts.

Judges will want to see how the pandemic has impacted on climate actions and what opportunities this has brought.  

TEC will kindly offer to the 2023 Winner of the 2030 Climate Action category free 10 days consultancy in direct support of delivery of the winning project subject to a maximum of £8,500 (excluding VAT). Full conditions and details will be sent to the Winner. If judges bestow a win to both a small and a large institution, the judges will agree on the split proportionate to the scoring given.

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

The Winning entry will automatically be put forward for the International Green Gown Award for 2030 Climate Action.

Proudly supported by TEC.

Benefitting Society 

As anchor institutions in their communities and cities, universities and colleges benefit society in many ways. This category captures the powerful and innovative ways education institutions are realising their purpose in today’s society to benefit the lives of individuals, communities and wider society. Examples will range from economic, social and environmental impacts with organisations and sectors outside the institution where innovative new approaches to bringing positive benefit can be found.

Although all applications will be considered on their merits, the judges will particularly be looking for innovative community engagement type of initiatives which have an element of proactive, new, community and social concern and positive impacts, rather than the very worthy and commendable ‘grass roots’ and ‘business as usual’ activities.

Amongst others, examples might include how an institution applies and exchanges its student and academic knowledge with communities or partner organisations, how it uses its finances and investments, how it designs and manages its campus, how positive actions bring global benefits such as circular economy and Modern Slavery Act approaches - all to demonstrate its values and the positive value it brings to society. A powerful example of such innovative and proactive engagement is the Living Lab approach: establishing projects that draw on students’ curricular work or academic research to address real sustainability challenges in stakeholder partnerships with community bodies.

Activities which have a substantial student element should be submitted to the Student Engagement category. 

Judges recognise that not all projects will have a carbon saving, or include elements of environmental, social, cultural as well as economic benefit.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

The Winning entry will automatically be put forward for the International Green Gown Award for Benefitting Society.

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Campus Health, Food and Drink      

This category includes all food, drink, kitchen and hospitality aspects of healthy, sustainable institutions. Applications are to show a holistic life-cycle approach and go beyond good practice/current trends and that standard credentials, as examples of good practice, will already be in place.

The judges will be looking for holistic approaches across the whole institution that show creativity, innovation and consideration for how healthy food and drink is procured, cooked and served considering environmental and social issues and making informed selections.

Judges will be looking at the whole life-cycle approach, which could include:

• Whole supply chain – cause and effect data (by avoiding decisions that fix one problem but cause another or if it is changed is it better)
• Efficient waste management and complete waste cycle streams
• Menu engineering – addressing carbon reduction and supply chain and cause and effect issues
• Linkages with academics and research on approaches taken
• Hospitality & Food Service kitchen(s) (HaFS)– management of energy and water waste (including procurement of energy efficient equipment)

With additional evidence of:

• Follow-up and engagement – what happened after?
• How behaviour change and where appropriate, health and well-being, has been encouraged across staff, students and the broader community (include numbers)
• Purchasing strategies – how have these changed?
• Communication, education and awareness of all parts of the life-cycle
• How your institution stands out from the crowd and is going above and beyond the norm.

Applications are only likely to be successful if they provide quantitative evidence on a holistic, whole life-cycle approach, and not just with focus on one or two individual campaigns and must be able to demonstrate cause and effect between activities undertaken and improvements achieved.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Creating Impact - NEW

This category recognises institutions that have achieved significant sustainability-related outcomes, on-campus or within their community, using minimal and/or limited resources. Initiatives need to demonstrate the relationship/link between the number of resources used (for example staffing, budget, time) and the level of impact achieved (for example quantifiable changes in behaviours and/or reportable metrics). Institutions that have received substantial external funding for their initiative are not eligible for this category.

Initiatives could include those which can demonstrate significant sustainability achievements (such as sustainable products, processes or learnings) in a relatively short period and/or with a restricted budget, and/or with a small staff base e.g. good progress from a low base. Projects that raise the broader profile of sustainability and working in your community will be particularly favoured.

Initiatives can cover a single aspect of sustainability or a focussed impact area or as a whole-institution approach, including but not limited to: facilities & operations; learning & teaching, research; leadership and governance; community; procurement, and engagement. However, regardless of the topical focus, the primary aim of this category is to demonstrate how institutions can still achieve creative and high impact outcomes with limited resources.

Judges will be particularly interested in initiatives that have gone towards supporting a social and environmental sustainable recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic that have been embedded and will be sustained post-pandemic. This might be a surprising collaboration, changing practices or a new opportunity for your institution.

Note: If your initiative has a strong research element you should enter for the Research with Impact category. If your initiative has a strong health/food/drink element you should enter for the Campus Health, Food & Drink category. If your initiative had a strong element of an individuals impact you should enter for the Sustainability Champion category.

The Winning entry will automatically be put forward for the International Green Gown Award for Creating Impact.

Proudly supported by the Scottish Funding Council.

Digital Futures - NEW 

This category recognises the digital transformation of education and research to improve the student experience, campus environment and teaching/research practices. It is essential that IT infrastructure is not only resilient, but how it considers IT developments through the lens of sustainability. Advances in internet connectivity, artificial intelligence and augmented reality have scope to transform campuses and learning into more immersive and more sustainable experiences. Similarly, the digital revolution is driving smart buildings, intelligent campuses, and step-change advances across all aspects of an institution giving students a richer experience of learning and teaching.

The opportunities to drive innovation in sustainability in next generation campuses span across estate, teaching and research functions, whether it be driving resource efficiencies, improving effectiveness of reporting, climate resilience, sustainable considerations for external services such as cloud-based or using virtual technology to simulate real world experience; judges will be interested to see how the digital revolution is being used to deliver sustainable campuses. The possibilities are endless, and judges will particularly look for a whole institution mix of enhancement of learning and wider student and community outcomes.

Applications are only likely to be successful if they provide quantitative evidence on the nature of the improvements made and demonstrate a causal relationship between activities undertaken and improvements achieved.

Proudly sponsored by Jisc.

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion in Sustainability 

This category is recognising the work institutions undertake to integrate equity, social justice and inclusion within their sustainability work. Disadvantaged groups will be impacted the most by climate change so equity and equality are core to achieving a sustainable world. Institutions have to take new approaches and different ways to engage broader diverse audiences and champions. With sustainability being the second least diverse sector after farming the sector needs to look at ways to improve sustainability as a profession and integrate green careers and skills into their work. The sector needs to look at the barriers that exist which exclude particular protected characteristics and celebrate areas where these have been broken down and accelerated to a more inclusive sustainability approach.

This category recognises those surprising collaborations and innovate approaches that staff and students take to improve diversity, equity and inclusion in their sustainability work. Approaches may include how institutions promote sustainability as a career to a broad audience to cultivate diverse and equitable professional opportunities. Judges will be looking for institutions that have ongoing commitments to embed equality and inclusion within sustainability practices or impactful initiatives that push the boundaries and challenge the status quo to improve diversity, equity and inclusion.

Judges will be looking for institutions that have innovative collaborations within or beyond their institutions. Examples could be, but not limited to:

• Integrating within teaching that encourages diversity in sustainability
• Engagement with the wider community to focus on under-represented groups within your local region to engage with sustainability
• Leading practises or initiatives that lead to greater access and participation in sustainability
• Innovative internal collaborations across departments
• Leading research that addresses barriers and challenges.

Judges will be looking for evidence of the impact of the initiative and must be able to show that it exceeds normal performance as well as looking at potential to scale-up and replicate across the sector.

Other categories recognise community and student engagement more generally and applicants are to apply under those categories where protected characteristics and/or elevated community vulnerability to climate change was not central or only part of the initiative. 

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

The Winning entry will automatically be put forward for the International Green Gown Award for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Sustainability.

Money for Good

As anchor institutions in their communities and cities, universities and colleges wield real economic and financial power. This category celebrates educational institutions which are consciously using this power to drive positive societal, environmental or cultural change. No matter how small your resources are, judges will be looking at the resulting beneficial social and environmental impacts.

The judges are looking for innovative ways that institutions use their money for good. Financial sustainability is essential and the category awards those universities and colleges who align their financial strategy with their broader sustainability objectives. Such innovation can be found for example, in using small-scale internal ring fenced funds which support sustainability initiatives or influencing society benefit through procurement contracts, social enterprises, social investment models and every day ethical banking. For those institutions with treasury, endowment or pension assets, the judges are looking for institutions who incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors across their investments and proactively use their capital through impact investments. For example, using endowment capital to invest in funds or businesses aligned with key research themes at the institution.

This category will recognise those who have taken a brave step to use their funds to directly support a project or initiatives that have real environmental, social or cultural impact. The judges will be looking for strong stakeholder engagement with staff and students and will be focusing on the scale of impact and not the actual value of the funds.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Nature Positive - NEW 

From the air we breathe to the water we drink and the food we eat, nature provides the essentials we all rely on for our survival and well-being, including crucial economic, health, cultural and spiritual benefits. To reflect the biodiversity and ecological crisis the world is facing, this new category champions those institutions who are taking action to promote nature on their campuses, in their operations and teaching and research as well as working in partnership with their local communities. This category is in recognition of the Global Goal for Nature to be net positive by 2030 and the landmark deal on the Global Biodiversity Framework at the UN Biodiversity Summit (COP15). Nature must recover so that thriving ecosystems and nature-based solutions continue to support future generations, the diversity of life and play a critical role in combating climate change.

Institutions have a critical power and influence to build more resilient ecosystems and help nature recover, whilst simultaneously addressing societal challenges such as climate change, human health, resource security, and natural disaster risk reduction and adaptation.

Being Nature Positive means halting and reversing nature loss so that species and ecosystems start to recover. For institutions this means restoring species and ecosystems that have been harmed by the impacts of the institution and its activities and enhancing the institution’s positive impacts on nature.

Applications are encouraged from institutions that can demonstrate how their Nature Positive actions have positive impacts on both the community and the environment, including how they are engaging and educating their students and staff on nature positive approach.

Judges will be looking for institutions that can provide:

• Evidence of a biodiversity baseline, demonstrating that they have conducted an initial assessment of the biodiversity on their campuses and in surrounding areas, and have established a baseline against which future progress can be measured as a minimum
• Ambition and stringency of nature recovery targets, such as increasing species diversity, restoring habitats and ecosystem services and reducing the impacts of their operations on biodiversity
• Clear actions and implementation plans on the innovative actions they are taking to reach their nature recovery targets
• Measurable progress toward targets and transparently report on their actions, performance, lessons learned and challenges
• Evidence of integrating Nature Positive approaches into core operations and decision-making process, from research to education, procurement, infrastructure and community engagement
• Positive impacts both with students, staff and local communities

Judges will favour applications that can demonstrate collaboration and sharing best practices with other stakeholders, such as local communities, governments, businesses and NGOs.

Signatories of Nature Positive Universities are encouraged to apply.

Note: If your initiative has a strong health, food or drink element you should apply for the Campus Health, Food & Drink category.

The Winning entry will automatically be put forward for the International Green Gown Award for Nature Positive.

Next Generation Learning and Skills 

This category recognises achievement in the development of academic courses, skills and capabilities relevant to sustainability. These can be vocational, undergraduate or postgraduate courses or related to wider purposes such as community involvement, global or environmental awareness or to support lifestyle changes.

Examples of possible application topics include:  Apprenticeships; Continuing professional development (CPD) activities;  Skill-focused courses leading to professional or vocational qualifications;  Informal adult learning; community learning; and short courses for practitioners; The development of new courses focused on some or all sustainable development issues;  Adaptation of existing courses; Use of practical sustainability-related projects or other practical activities within courses;  Work-based learning initiatives; Staff development.

Applications can be made for activities connected with academic courses if there is a practical focus on the development of specific skills which goes beyond the normal activities of the disciplinary curriculum, e.g. running community-based projects which give students considerable autonomy and develop their communication, management abilities etc.

Possible applicants for this category include: Higher Education institutions; Further Education colleges; adult and community and work-based learning providers.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

The Winning entry will automatically be put forward for the International Green Gown Award for Next Generation Learning and Skills.

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Research with Impact – Institution 

This category recognises the importance and societal impact of research and development by post-16 education as a driver of sustainable development and implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. As claims of impact from research and development can be difficult to judge, entries are sought which:

• Are about tangible improvements resulting from research & development, rather than the findings or quality of the research & development itself
• Can provide quantitative evidence of what those improvements and resulting sustainability benefits and impacts are. Outcomes linked to the Research Excellence Framework, if applicable, are required
• Can demonstrate a clear and unambiguous causal link between the research & development and improvements and benefits.
• Note that adoption or dissemination measures will not be considered sufficient evidence by themselves – there needs to be a further stage of demonstration that adoption or dissemination has actually produced results.

Possible activities include:

• Research and development leading to mitigation of environmental and wider sustainability-based impacts related to existing technology
• Research and development that has created new products with demonstrable superiority to existing ones with regard to sustainability
• Research that incorporates the above two, and other principles, as part of a Living Lab project that is successful in co-creating & co-implementing a transformation.

Judges will be also interested in innovative approaches to better link academic research with industry need. Eligible entries can include both large-scale projects with major impacts as well as small-scale projects that provide tangible impacts in focused areas/technologies, or amongst specific target audiences. In line with the broader sustainability agenda, judges will be keen to see evidence on how the project links with the Sustainable Development Goals.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Student Engagement

This category reflects that students and staff must work together to achieve goals using “top-down” and “bottom-up grass roots” methods to achieve maximum understanding and engagement across an institution. This in turn aids student progress and allows for opportunities to gain transferable employability skills. It looks at both the student input and the staff commitment and the relationship between the two. It must be clear that initiatives include both staff and students (not just one party) working in partnership.

Where staff and students are involved, as well as including the actual numbers, include how they are involved and what impact/influence they have had.

Examples could include: Social media projects; Awareness and communication campaigns; Procurement actions; Sustainability reporting and websites; Volunteering activities organised by unions, societies and similar organisations within institutions; Community projects.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

Applications are equally welcomed from institutions or student bodies.

The Winning entry will automatically be put forward for the International Green Gown Award for Student Engagement.

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Sustainability Institution of the Year 

This category recognises sustained, whole-institution commitment and impact to becoming a sustainable organisation.

To improve economic and social responsibility and environmental performance through a whole institution approach, strategic sustainability activities through four main areas must be achieved:

• Leadership and Governance
• Estates and Operations
• Learning, Teaching and Research
• Partnership and Engagement

Applications are only likely to be successful if they provide considerable quantitative evidence on the nature of the improvements made and also demonstrate a causal relationship between activities undertaken and improvements achieved based on the four areas. Initiatives must have been running for at least five years.

Judges will be looking for evidence of whole institution measuring and reporting such as the Sustainability Leadership Scorecard or equivalent.

Judges will be looking for key areas where it is felt that the institution is distinctive compared to its peers, and provide supporting evidence. Tangible evidence of high level commitment, and its incorporation into management procedures, will also carry great weight with the judges as will engagement with the UN Sustainable Development Goals and public reporting of performance. 

Judges welcome more granular data so others in the sector can learn and replicate approaches taken by these leading institutions.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

NOTE: Only educational institutions, such as a college or university, can apply for this category. This category is not open for student unions or third parties. 

The Winning entry will be put forward for the International Green Gown Award for Sustainability Institution of the Year.

Proudly supported by the EAUC 

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Tomorrow’s Employees

For a sustainable industry and economy, we need students leaving universities and colleges with the necessary understanding and skill sets.  Judged by leading industry sustainability executives, this category recognises institutions which are taking pioneering and innovative steps to ensure that their leavers are future-fit.

Judges will be looking for new approaches and initiatives taken by institutions, but will also be keen to see systemic and whole-institution approaches for example a Living Labs or when sustainability is embedded in course development, review and/or quality procedures etc.   Applications might also include new approaches to academia/ industry linkage and understanding as well as how staff development is aligned to achieving this. Qualities and skills that will be considered include both academic abilities and personal attributes which are transferrable into the working environment and can be gained through the course of study or engagement in student life.

Strategic leadership and commitment will be expected as will reference to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and campus sustainability to frame and resource the development of learners ready and equipped to deliver a sustainable economy and society.

It must be evidenced that the initiative enhances the student's employability skills as well as resulting in beneficial social and environmental impacts.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

This category is an institutional award.

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Reporting with Influence 

This Award aims to assess how sustainability is reported and how reports are used to impact and influence within the institution. Reports must be publicly available information provided by institutions. The quality, data or presentation of reports will not be judged. Applications should provide:

The following evidence of the impacts of the report will be considered:

• Consideration of sustainability risks and opportunities and how this factors into institutional decision making.
• Evidence of clear linkages with Governors and senior management.
• Evidence of engaging with internal and external stakeholders, and how this has impacted on the organisation's strategy. Specifically looking at who has been involved in the creation of the report. It should be clear on who the audience is in terms of attempting to influence, internal or external stakeholders, and to what extent this has been achieved.
• Evidence of internal or external assurance over data.
• Evidence of how the report fits with core business, institution wide KPIs and targets.
• Evidence of how the report is integrated within broader business reporting.

Applicants are to submit their latest sustainability report or sustainability section of their annual report or full integrated annual reports via appropriate web links. Supporting narrative to illustrate the impact of the report is required.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

The Reporting with Influence category can be applied for every year as long as the report submitted is for a different year/period than has been previously submitted.

Proudly supported by Hillside Environmental Services

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Individual Categories Criteria:

Research with Impact – Student 

This category recognises excellent student research that progresses the field of sustainability and beneficially impacts on society.

Applicants should have completed a piece of sustainability-related research at undergraduate, master’s level or small research pieces as part of a PhD (not full PhD research), in any discipline, done at a further or higher education institution, assessed within the last calendar year, and scored a 2:1/60%/Merit or above#. The project could be a freestanding piece of work, a product of a Living Lab project or be completed in partnership with an on- or off-campus partner.

Examples include:

• The benefits of biodiversity initiatives on an organisations’ premises;
• Community development, social inclusion or assisting disadvantaged people;
• Alternative ways of communicating sustainability messages;
• Potential new energy-efficient technologies;
• The impacts of alternative methods of trading;
• An evaluation of water-saving technology in a company;
• A resource-efficient engineering or architectural design.

The focus of this award is the impact (actual or estimated) of the research. Judges will be looking for evidence of the project’s potential to strengthen at least one of the three pillars of sustainability: environmental, social or economic as well as links to the Sustainable Development Goals.

Applications will be judged on impact and not on the quality of the research itself as that has already been independently verified by the institution.

Applicants are to use the Individual Application Form. The Proposer in the Application Form should be your tutor who can verify your grade/score. If your project work is carried out in a team (i.e. team dissertation) then you may submit on behalf of the team and make it clear in the application form that this is the case.

#The grade/score must be included in the Application Form. If this is not known before the application deadline of 5 June, then the stage 1 application form must be submitted by the deadline and a follow up email from the student/tutor to greengown@eauc.org.uk informing of the grade, is to be sent as soon as known and by 30 June latest.

Finalists for this category will be invited to take part in the Meliora International Symposium of Student Sustainability Research with the Winner(s) invited to speak at the Symposium. 

Applicants are to use the Individual Application Form.

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.

Sustainability Champion

The Sustainability Champion Award is an individual award open to both staff and students at a tertiary education institution. It will recognise people at any level who have worked hard at implementing a sustainability project/initiative (or several) and whose involvement has made a positive impact be that on their peers, their institution, their students, their local community or their local workforce. A key criterion is actions that have been taken over and above the normal requirements of people’s jobs. Applications must provide evidence of impact, and of good leadership/championing practice in engaging and inspiring others.

Judges will, particularly this year, want to see how the pandemic has impacted on initiatives and what opportunities this has brought.  

This category is open to staff who do not have a formal responsibility for sustainability. 

Individuals apply themselves but should be formally nominated by a manager or peer (within or outside the sector). Individuals that have won previously can reapply after 2 years. Teams are allowed to be submitted as long as the role and impact of each team member is made clear.

Judges have the discretion to award two Winners:

Sustainability Staff Champion
Sustainability Student Champion.

Proudly supported by SALIX.

Applicants are to use the Individual Application Form

Get inspiration from past Winners and Finalists here.